You are welcome
to this page, a blog in which we break down and analyze the information
presented in the management system standards, in order to increase our knowledge about them and
that they can be applied in the best way. I hope that the information presented
in this post will be of interest to you and that it will somewhat enrich your
knowledge of ISO 9001:2015 standard and its
requirements.
In this entry we begin the analysis of the groups of requirements corresponding to Sub-clause 5.2 – Policy of ISO 9001: 2015 standard, so we will begin with Section 5.2.1 Establishment of the quality policy. This section, which in the standard is presented in a small paragraph and four subsections, when applying the methodology that we usually use to break down the text of sub-clauses, in this type of standard, becomes in eighteen requirements, which are all important so that an effective and high-value quality management system can be established. Due to the great importance of these requirements, in this post we will analyze the first three of them, which are the most complicated to analyze, in order to facilitate their understanding. We will be analyzing the rest of those requirements in the following two posts.
However,
before beginning with this analysis of requirements
of Section 5.2.1, it is important to present to you some useful preliminary information
for a better understanding and application of the requirements of all this Sub-clause 5.2, and of which little is mentioned in relation to this ISO 9001
Standard.
First of all,
it is important to consider that in its Clause 3 - Terms and definitions, the ISO 9000 Standard, in its Subsection
3.5.8, presents the term "policy" and defines it as follows:
We can
understand this in a better way, if we consider that intention is a word
which means “what one intends to accomplish or attain”; and we can understand by direction: “guidance
or supervision of action or conduct.”
In its next subsection, 3.5.9, this standard presents the definition
of the following term:
Along with
this definition, the ISO 9000: 2015 standard presents the following explanatory notes:
Note 1 to entry: Generally the quality policy is consistent with the overall policy of the organization, can be aligned with the organization’s vision and mission, and provides a framework for the setting of quality objectives.
Note 2 to entry: Quality management principles
presented in this International Standard can form a
basis for the establishment of a quality policy.
These terms
lead us to consider that the policy, in this case of quality, should integrate a series of elements: on the one hand, those that
identify the "intentions" of the organization in terms of quality, which can be from a single intention, to all those that the organization can identify
as desirable or necessary. On the other hand, this policy should integrate as well, all the direction elements that it considers relevant in this matter
of quality.
The top
management of an organization that establishes a quality management system in compliance
with ISO 9001 standard should take
into account that the quality
policy is a strategic
element of great
importance so that said system can be valuable to the organization itself. In
fact, for the quality management system, the quality
policy is the most
important strategic element, because all
other activities that are going to be carried out within that system should be
aimed at complying with that policy. Of course
that there are strategic elements of a higher level than this policy, such as the mission, vision and values, but these
are above this management system, and it is
the policy that should be aligned with those elements.
Similarly, it
is very important to understand that this quality policy is a statement that should be issued by top
management and contain
various components, including intentions and direction elements, in accordance with the requirements of this Section 5.2.1.
However, a
common flaw in organizations that apply
these quality management systems, based on
the ISO 9001: 2018 standard, is that the quality policy they establish are not elements generated by top management, but rather by some operational-type mid-level official, perhaps with
the participation of some technical manager and, therefore, these policies do not integrate either the intentions or the direction elements that
should be established and formally expressed by top management. So, they
are elements that do not really make up a quality policy, according these requirements, but some statement that contains some phrases, more motivational than
guiding, with the intention of meeting with a requirement of the standard, but that are far from complying with all requirements established for said policy. In most of
these cases, these policies do not meet the definition presented above, nor do
they contain the intentions or the direction elements that can serve as a guide to the entire organization in terms of quality, nor do they meet the requirements contained in this Section 5.2.1
of the standard, which we will see in this post, and which very few people and organizations take into account.
After this
brief introduction to the subject, we begin with the analysis of the requirements related to
the quality policy that I will analyze in this post, and which are the
following:
As I have
mentioned in other entries regarding analysis of requirements
of management system standards, we should be careful when reading these requirements, since the way in which the texts are presented
in these standards, when separating each requirement individually, seems that these are repeated.
However, each of them sets a different specification from the others.
In accordance
with Technical Specification ISO/TS 9002:2016 - Quality management systems —
Guidelines for the application of ISO 9001:2015, the intent of this Section 5.2.1
is to ensure that a quality policy is established aligned with the strategic direction of the organization, including the organization's general understanding of what quality means to it and its customers. The quality
policy describes the intentions and direction of the organization as formally expressed by top
management.
The ISO 9001:2015 standard establishes the following requirements derived from
the Section
5.2.1, and I present them with the corresponding
progressive numbering, as I have been presenting all the requirements of this standard that I have
been analyzing.
Requirement No. 92: Top management shall establish a quality
policy that is appropriate to the purpose of the organization.
The first thing that this requirement establishes, and that is repeated in some subsequent ones that
correspond to this sub-clause, is that top
management should establish the organization's quality policy, but it also establishes that it should be appropriate to the purpose of the organization.
This leads us to identify the meaning of the word "establish", which we previously did in what corresponds to Sub-clause 4.4 of this standard:
Based on this definition, top management should develop and bring into existence a quality
policy for the organization, and for this, it should take into account the
definition, previously presented, of this term, so that it can be well
established and be a valuable element of the quality
management system.
The second element to consider from this requirement is that this quality policy should be appropriate to the purpose of the organization. However, a question could enter here: What is the
purpose of an organization? How can we find it, understand it or know it?
I have read and analyzed many ISO management system standards, and I have not found a single one of them that
defines the concept of purpose, although it is included in all of these standards.
However, if we investigate enough, we can find some answer, and in this
case we found the standard ISO 37000:2021
-Governance of organizations — Guidance, which presents the following definition:
This definition is presented with two notes:
Note 1 to entry: The organizational purpose is the ultimate value the organization intends to generate for specified stakeholders.
Note 2 to entry: The organizational purpose guides the performance objectives and provides clear context for daily decision-making by relevant stakeholders.
Additionally, in the ISO 9000:2015 standard, two terms and their definitions are included that can shed some light on this concept:
If we add another term to these two, that is related to them, which is values, this one is
not defined in the ISO 9000:2015 standard, but whose definition appears in the ISO 22316:2017 standard - Security and resilience -
Organizational resilience - Principles and attributes, and is as follows:
Similarly, the standard ISO
37000:2021 - Governance of organizations — Guidance contains the definition of the following term,
which although not identical to the previous one, is very similar and indicates
the relevance of this concept:
Let's think that in order to have a reasonable expectation for an organization to operate in a valuable way, it should do some planning activities.
But, for that organization to be able to properly carry out its planning, it should
have some basic elements, such as mission and vision, and if possible with the identification of the
relevant values for the organization, these three elements together are known as “purpose of the organization”. We can visualize this as follows:
We can consider that the purpose of an organization is identified from two key strategic elements for any organization, which are the mission and vision, which may be accompanied by another element, that
we can consider as complementary, such as values, but which is important in guiding and supporting
the behavior of the entire organization. These elements should be established by the owners and would mean why the organization was created (fundamental goal), and what would be the expectations of its
performance in a certain period of time.
The fact that an organization should have identified a mission, vision and values, does not
mean that they are specific requirements of the ISO 9001 standard, nor of any management system standard, since it is considered that every organization should have these elements identified and documented, before they even
think about establishing their quality management system, and that they should be accessible to its entire
staff. Also, it is considered that an organization could not perform in a successful way if it does not have these primary strategic elements. These elements can also be modified, either to redefine them, enrich
them, or to redirect them.
It would be expected that this purpose would establish the reason that justifies the
existence of an organization based on three elements: its profits, its impact
on society, and its impact on the people that comprise it.
Once the concept of organizational purpose is understood, top management should ensure that the quality policy is appropriate and aligned with these elements. This would mean that by consistently applying and complying with this policy, the organization would be getting closer to fulfilling that purpose.
The technical specification ISO/TS 9001:2018 - Quality
management systems — Guidelines for the application of the ISO 9001:2015 indicates that in order to establish the food safety policy, entries such as the following may be taken into
account:
— a clear understanding of the context of the organization, including the current performance of its management system and the needs and expectations of its relevant interested
parties;
— the organization’s strategic direction, based on its mission, vision, guiding principles and core values;
— the level and type of future improvements
needed for the organization to be successful;
— the expected degree of customer
satisfaction;
— the resources needed to
meet intended results;
— the potential contributions of relevant interested parties.
Requirement No. 93: Top management shall establish a quality
policy that is appropriate to the context of the organization.
We already
saw with the previous requirement what it means for top management to establish a quality policy. In addition to that, the requirement establishes that this policy is
appropriate to the context of the organization.
For this, it
is good to remember what the context of the organization means, in
accordance with the ISO 9000:2015 standard.
This
definition in the ISO 9000:2015 standard contains four notes, which contain important complementary
information, and I present below:
Note 1 to entry: The objectives of the organization may be related to its products and services,
investments and behavior towards its interested
parties.
Note 2 to entry: The concept of context of the organization is equally applicable
to not-for-profit or public service organizations as it is to those seeking profit.
Note 3 to entry: In English language, this concept is often referred to by
other terms, such as “business environment”, “organizational environment” or “ecosystem for
an organization”.
Note 4 to entry: Understanding the infrastructure
can help to define the context of the organization.
Thus, this requirement indicates that this quality policy should be appropriate to this context of
the organization, considering the internal and external issues, determined by the organization, that are relevant to its purpose and that affect its ability to achieve the expected
results of its quality management system, as set out
in ISO 9001 Sub-Clause 4.1. It should consider what the organization has determined in terms of the needs
and expectations of its interested parties, as set out in Sub-Clause 4.2. This policy should also consider the scope
of the QMS, as established in Sub-clause 4.3, and also the characteristics of the quality management system itself, as established in Sub-clause 4.4 of this standard.
This can be
visualized as follows:
Requirement No. 94: Top management shall establish a quality
policy that supports the organization`s strategic
direction.
We have already seen with the previous requirements what it means for top management to establish a quality policy. In addition to this, this
requirement establishes that this quality policy supports the strategic direction of the organization.
We have here a little problem. Although all management system standards refer to the concept of strategic management, none of them define
this term. The ISO 9000:
2015 standard contains the definition of the following term:
And the ISO 21001: 2018 standard, mentioned above,
indicates another definition of this term:
Another term that we find, but this time in
the ISO 24513:
2019 standard - Service activities related to the supply of drinking water,
wastewater and stormwater systems — Vocabulary is the following:
And another interesting definition is
presented by the ISO 30400:2022 standard, on the following term:
However, even if the standards do not have this
definition, if we search carefully, we can find one that can help us:
We can understand then, after this puzzle of
definitions, that the strategic direction is the part of top management that is in charge of
formulating the strategic
plan and deploys the set of strategic elements that are generated from
the organizational
purpose (mission, vision and values), such as general objectives, policies, specific objectives, plans and processes.
The strategic direction formulates and implements
the strategy, mobilizing the resources
of the organization and attending to the
complexity of the organizations and the environment. It should
be a mixture of knowledge of the environment, a planned, organized, clear and
responsible management with its resources, at
the same time that it is assertive regarding what the organization should improve to
increase its competitive capacity in the market and achieve excellent results.
Based on this strategic plan, the strategic management should develop, together
with the operational areas of the organization, the tactical planning, and from this, the
operational areas will develop their operational planning, including the goals (partialized specific objectives considering the time
factor).
In the next entry we will continue with the
analysis of requirements derived from Section 5.2.1 of ISO 9001:2015.
I will be grateful to the readers who upload
their doubts or comments about this analysis.
Author:
Ernesto Palomares Hilton
Comments
Post a Comment
Nombre:
País:
Comentarios: